STATS
| rating | goal | assists | total... | passes | key... | duels won | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vs![]() | 6.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
21 Oct 23FT
12
| Club | Season | lineup... | match... | yellow... | red... | mins | goals... |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014/2015 | 9 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 791 | 0.12 | |
| 2016/2017 | 33 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 2765 | 0.12 | |
| 2017/2018 | 15 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 1246 | 0.05 | |
| 2018/2019 | 24 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 2060 | 0.04 | |
| 2019/2020 | 21 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 1745 | 0.29 | |
| 2020/2021 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 495 | 0.17 | |
| 2021/2022 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 150 | 0.00 | |
| 2022/2023 | 18 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 1610 | 0.14 | |
| Total | 127 | 153 | 16 | 0 | 10862 | 0.12 |
OPPONENT
| Opponent | M | W | D | L | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Current market value
- Highest transfer fee
- Transfer fee
Performance Overview
-%
Passes accuracy
-
Keys passes
-%
Minutes per game
Defending
Clean sheets-
Interceptions per game-
Tackles per game-
Possession won-
Dribbled past per game-
Clearances per game-
Error led to shot-
Error led to goal-
Penalty committed
Player Information
Age
33
Born: 19/10/1992
Height
172
Position
Midfielder
Deniz Cicek played in 2 teams:
Havelse, Sportfreunde LotteWhen and where played Deniz Cicek?
Deniz Cicek (Germany) currently plays for club Eilvese. Deniz Cicek is 33 years old (19/10/1992) and he is 172 tall. Deniz Cicek jersey number is 10.
How many Salary earn Deniz Cicek per year?
Deniz Cicek receive a Salary per year
In this profile you will can follow the player data information, statistics, career history and performance of Deniz Cicek in Eilvese matches.
Show more ›››
vs


